View Full Version : Which is better Robots.txt or Meta Robots Tag?
swatijain2233
10-25-2016, 07:39 AM
Hello friends,
I want to Know that Which is better Robots.txt or Meta Robots Tag?
In Google Webmaster Tools, im usually reminded by Google that i do not have robots file. So i think this robots.txt is important to be there and personally i would not care about meta tags.
jjohanson
11-18-2016, 04:07 PM
I think If you are using both then It is good. Personally i am using. But robots txt file is important.
incomecracker
11-19-2016, 05:36 AM
In order to exclude individual pages from search engine indices, the noindex meta tag is actually superior to robots.txt. ... You want to use 'noindex,follow' in a robots meta tag, rather than robots.txt , because it will allow the link juice to pass through. It is better from a SEO perspective.
coolsimrankaur
11-19-2016, 11:40 AM
Robots.txt is most preferred option.
Leasedlayer
05-05-2017, 06:46 AM
Using robots.txt is better compared to using robots meta tag.Because by using robots.txt we are providing the instructions to robots for all the pages of web site.It consumes very less time compared to using robots tag which we have to mention separately for all the pages,which is very time consuming and quite confusing.So usage of robots.txt is better.
VPS9 Networks
05-06-2017, 09:27 AM
Robots.txt is better as the instructions included in that file can be used for entire site and not only to single web page.
Robots.txt tag is far better. In this you can block the whole directory path at once.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Alpha 2 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.